Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich countries should take more refugees and provide them with food and shelter. This essay agrees with this view because wealthy countries have enough resources to do this and the refugees are fleeing from countries that are affected by war and famine.
The main reason developed countries should take more displaced people is that they have the financial ability to do so. Countries like the UK, Canada and Japan have huge budgets that they collect in the form of tax from individuals and companies operating in their territory. It would only take a fraction of their wealth to accommodate and feed millions of poorer people. For instance, it is estimated that GDP of the UK is over 20 trillion dollars, and all Syrian refugees could be resettled for less than a billion dollar.
Wealthy nations also have a moral obligation because refugees are trying to enter their land because their homes have been destroyed by war. No one wants to leave their homeland with their families unless it is essential to do so and if Western countries refuse to take them in, they will certainly be in danger of losing their lives. For example, people from Syria have no food and are often caught in the middle of full scale battles and that is the main reason why nearly 5 million of them have escaped.
In conclusion, affluent states should step in to help the refugees because they have the ability to afford and it will save millions of lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75590551181 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33195859227 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53937007874 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.271438684 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209222870469 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955172452939 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10003507003 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142969868295 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108080218348 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.