The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows a comparison between reasons why people going to work by cycling or driving. Health and fitness, less pollution, safety, comfort etc. are the criteria on which the comparison has been done.
In the first pie chart, the two major reasons for choosing cycling over the driving is health & fitness and less pollution. This shares equal part and sums up to 60% of the population who prioritize cycling over driving. Rest of the reasons why people go to work by cycling is that they do not have to face parking problem and it cost no money to them as cycle does not require any kind of fuel. Moreover, there are some cases where people feel it takes lesser time to travel by bicycle then by driving a car. These three cases 'no parking problem', 'no cost' and 'faster than driving' shares nearly equal part of the pie chart.
Looking at the second pie chart, the major reason why people prefer driving over cycling is because of their comfort. Around 40% of the total driving population want to travel in comfortable environment. The second greatest reason is the distance to work which sums up to 21%. 14% believe driving is faster than cycling (so why waste time?) and they have to carry things to work. Some people are conscious about their safety, these are 11% of the driving population.
We can compare both the pie charts and it is very lucid that people have altogether different reasons why they prefer driving or cycling. People are conscious about their safety, health, time to work, and about the environment too. There are mix batches of people who have their own reason why they prefer cycling over driving or the vice versa.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | dlswife | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | mango31799 | 78 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 56
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 73
- A nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...art, the two major reasons for choosing cycling over the driving is health & fitness an...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ople go to work by cycling is that they dont have to face parking problem and it cos...
^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...m and it cost no money to them as cycle doesnt require any kind of fuel. Moreover, the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... faster than cycling so why waste time? and they have to carry things to work. Some...
^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'batches'?
Suggestion: batches
...ut the environment too. There are a mix batch of people of who have their own reason ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...too. There are a mix batch of people of who have their own reason why they prefer c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68620689655 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2105009662 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5014772089 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9411764706 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 5.23603664747 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21505216052 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785573028571 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636851355072 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152860393064 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211390884051 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.