The charts below show the numbers of people in different aged groups who go sailing and or play basketball in Australia.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs show the average monthly amount that parents in Britain spent on their children’s sporting activities and the number of british children who took part in three different sports from 2008 to 2014. It is clear that parents spent more money each year on their children’s participation in sports over the six-year period. In terms of the number of children taking part, football was significantly more popular than athletics and swimming. In 2008, british parents spent an average of around £20 per month on their children’s sporting activities. parents’ spending on children’s sports increased gradually over the following six years, and by 2014 the average monthly amount had risen to just over £30. Looking at participation numbers, in 2008 approximately 8 million british children played football, while only 2 million children were enrolled in swimming clubs and less than 1 million practised athletics. The figures
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-08 | thong212001 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parents&apos
...ir children's sporting activities. parents' spending on children's sports inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 958, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...million practised athletics. The figures
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54421768707 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11526005389 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2549132561 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0387040004926 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.018519205679 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279293374642 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0387040004926 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.