adults to wear seat belts
The statement states that the law should not force adults to wear seat belts while they are driving or riding cars, as long as they know the risks and the dangers of driving without seat belts. Personally, I disagree with that statement. I believe the law should force the people to wear their seat belts. I feel this way for many reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, when people do not wear their seat belts, they put them self in a great danger and they may harm themselves. The law has the right to prevent the people from hurting themselves even if that was their freely choice. As many people do not what are good for them or may harm them self because of depression or other reasons. For example, the government has the right to prevent the people from taking drugs even when they know its effects on them. Likewise the government should prevent the people from harming themselves by forcing them to use seat belts.
Second, Some people do not wear the seat belts because they are lazy or they just forget to wear it even when they know how important is to wear it. They are gambling with their lives because they forget to wear it. Here comes the duty of the government, to make sure that nobody forgets their seat belts by forcing a bill on anyone who does not wear it. For instance, if you forgot that there are sharks in the sea and you want to go fishing in there. You need someone to remind you with that so you will not put yourself in danger. That is the role of the tickets when you forget to wear seat belts.
In summary, I strongly disagree that the people should be free to choose if they want to wear seat belts or not. Because if the people want to hurt themselves that does not mean we should let them do. Furthermore, the government should remind the people of the importance of wearing the seat belts by forcing a bill on anyone who do not wear them.
- art work must have meaning which most people can understand 50
- adults to wear seat belts 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 50
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 35
- Knowing that the percentage of positive reviews increased 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ven when they know its effects on them. Likewise the government should prevent the peopl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...if they want to wear seat belts or not. Because if the people want to hurt themselves t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, likewise, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in summary, mind you
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37746478873 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09051285555 2.79657885939 75% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416901408451 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6305199319 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33339465783 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122311318408 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129437150772 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2348865493 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972207599451 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 48.8420337079 159% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 12.1639044944 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.31 8.38706741573 75% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 100.480337079 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.