A tendency that the news reported in the media focuses on problems and emergencies rather than the positive developments is harmful to both the individual and the society. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent times, media has been in the limelight and has aroused the wide concern for the pernicious effects associated with it. Some people are of the fervent conviction that focusing on negative and urgent issues is detrimental to the society. Nonetheless, it is not always harmful and brings various benefits to society and people as well. This essay discusses both views before coming to some empirical conclusion.
To begin with, it is well-known fact that media coverage related to problems and urgent issues bring enormous benefits for both the social and citizens in several ways. Firstly, it is responsibility of the media to cover negative issues such as the natural disaster, which allows people to protect them from the potential financial loss and physical injury. To take a concrete example, new reports from the television programs covering the information about tsunami and earthquake in India set the pivotal platform for warning the government and inhabitants. Secondly, the environmental pollution topics from the media are of great necessity for protecting the environment. Indeed, it not only raises the public’s awareness of protecting habitats but also catch the government’s attention to this phenomenon.
However, the excessive reports on problems negatively influence the behavior of people, as well as the journalist’s conduct. It is obvious that people exposed to too much news about crimes or accidents lose the sense of security. As a result, they become over-cautious and suspicious of the others which lead to have difficulties to build interpersonal relationship. Moreover, it encourages journalists to create bad stories and deliver the exaggerated news. To explain, some people believe that the dramatic and exciting news easily draw the public’s attention, they tend to write their articles with the emphasis on negative parts of the stories to raise their newspaper’s sales. Therefore, it results in fake news and unreal stories.
In the light of these entire facts one can conclude that, although the bad news creates the felling of anxiety and uncomfortable to a large number of audiences, they are unavoidable in current information. The government and the citizens can learn to solve the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | my050901 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | vishal sachdeva | 77 | view |
- The supporters of genetic research claim that genetic engineering is the answer to many problems and it should be conducted and results should be rigorously applied Is it true that genetic research has more benefits compared to drawbacks 73
- Do you agree or that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games 73
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture What are your opinions on this 73
- In most of the countries number of plants and animal species are declining What is causing this What can we do to change the situation 86
- Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them from danger However children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sults in fake news and unreal stories. In the light of these entire facts one c...
^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...felling of anxiety and uncomfortable to a large number of audiences, they are unavoidable in curr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46306818182 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09229659491 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588068181818 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2160040109 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.117647059 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142384403039 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415002375541 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267184621895 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774699869633 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374588486745 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.