Today, the advanced science and technology have made great changes to people's life, but artists such as musicians, painters and writers are still highly valued. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is perhaps ironic that while the advancement in science and technology has made an enormous shift in people's lives by ameliorating the living standards and the general welfare of societies, the artwork paradoxically is mainly considered as superior to them. This essay will examine this issue and question what can be obtained from artists, whose creations have long been perpetuated in the vast majority of prosperous communities.
One school of thought believes that artworks mostly fail to contribute to societies' diligence and stamina to drastically boost in terms of economy and finance. The veracity of this view, for example, is corroborated by the findings of a monumental scientific research, which demonstrate that prominent discoveries in science have apparently led to the inventions of prevalent labour-saving devices that tweak in the era of globalization, thereby ensuring societies thrive economically as well as technologically. The pivotal aspect of this argument is that these incredible inventions have eradicated the most ubiquitous problems, namely communication barriers and transportation challenges which have long had detrimental effects on the development of countries. Furthermore, it must be stated that the creations of art are incapable of it. It is, therefore, irrational to put the priority on artwork rather than technological advancements.
Opposing school of thought, however, argues that art products have been, firstly, an indispensable factor in saving traditional customs of cultures from being jeopardized. A paramount bedrock for this axiomatic belief is that this is the sole way of not only saving these customs from being vanished but also perceiving them being transmitted from one generation to the next, thereby perpetuating their existence. Secondly, the proponents of art maintain that spiritual support and erudition in terms of religion and culture may be attained from truly ingenious art works that have hardly been subjected to fabrications. For instance, societies in the past history had been witnesses of an art creation like music being exploited in an effort to cure intractable diseases, mainly pertinent to human psychology. Thus, it is utterly naive to consider art as being overshadowed by science.
All things considered, it can be concluded that a certain degree of dedication to art is always necessary. The best course of action, however, would be an attempt to find the precise balance between the requirements of science and technology on the one hand and art works' on the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-11 | Ulugbek007 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is perhaps ironic that while the adva...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st majority of prosperous communities. One school of thought believes that artw...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather than technological advancements. Opposing school of thought, however, arg...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... art as being overshadowed by science. All things considered, it can be conclud...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50381679389 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18320915786 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58524173028 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3988036499 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130228585281 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471766175107 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352618364305 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927006112619 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360534476281 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.