As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
It is being a long time that people always worry about technology will hurt our thinking. Some people think human's thinking will deteriorate with the development of technology. However, I hold a different attitude to the idea, and I believe that technology will promote our mind in fact. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
First of all, the development of technology actually shows that the ability of human's thinking is becoming better. For example, we use many AI algorithms to help us solve problems such as how to improve the mobile network or how to distinguish the features between people. It seems that we are very easy to let AI help us to handle the process today, but we should not forget that the algorithms are created by us. In fact, such algorithms would appear because people try to use different ways to solve the problems which they hardly direct to find the answers. Nevertheless, it can be seen as another sublimation of thinking.
Second, the technology could aid us to explore ourselves. In a recent couple of years, the ability of the GO of AI has been high up to a totally different level. In the past, the Go players would never be defeated by the computer, but, with the appearing of Alpha GO, no players could beat it now. Therefore, many players in the field of Go are working hard to figure out a way to fight with Alpha GO. At the same time, it is a very good example to indicate that human develop some intelligence which outstrips to us, and we wish to win it back so that we pursue a higher realm in our brain.
Someone will think that although it may not hurt the thinking in the high-level society such as science or engineering field, the deterioration will happen in the general society. However, the development of the technology only gives people have more tools or manners to finish the problems. In the past, people may have to think about how to fix the problems, but, nowadays, people just become to think about how to select a method to fix the problems more effectively. Actually, there is only changing the context of the thinking, but not deterioration.
In summary, the technology is not going to hurt us. Practically, it gives us the way to stand on a much higher level to think about the world things. Thus, I am of the opinion that the deterioration of thinking is never coming from the technology. It will only cause by ourselves when we stop to think.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 86
- Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, the Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in 85
- A/D : The most important investment that can be made to the education of children aged four to seven is giving them a computer. 60
- the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the long break between semesters. Which of the following would you choose to do? (A) Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61893764434 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64851672808 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4896073903 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.547667536 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9090909091 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262476631506 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737773910042 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687546363409 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146099847568 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814708876446 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.