It is equally important for school children and university students to be involved in the extracurricular activities as it is good for academic studies and examinations. What’s your opinion? Use your expertise or examples to support.
Recently, the phenomenon of it is equally important for school children and university to be involved in the extracurricular activities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that it is good for academic studies and examinations can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, involving in the extracurricular activities is good for school children and university students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, and ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, good academic studies and examinations related to extracurricular activities by school children and university students might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the drawback of creative processes is correlated with negative vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of extracurricular activities are equally important for academic studies and examinations of school children and university students far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | baran.bahrani | 85 | view |
- What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions. 77
- Company's top-level authorities should get their employees in the decision-making process. 88
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education How far do you agree with this idea Support your opinion with reasons and or your personal experience 93
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience? 88
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87588652482 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39191950845 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578014184397 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0522705473 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.636363636 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3248458118 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116284062445 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119488025275 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203223734076 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480980160927 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.