The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 to 2012. Summarize the information.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 to 2012. Summarize the information.

The chart gives us information about rate changes in three types of crime in Newport between 2003 and 2012. Two of these crimes hadn't change much during this time span while the remaining one showed a sharp decrease.
Robbery rates had its slight up and downs during the years, but, stayed the same in total with around 750 incidents. Newport had less than 3000 car theft from 2003 to 2005. The number of car theft incidents reduce to 2000 in 2006 and went up moderately afterwards and reached its peak in 2012 with near 3250 car theft incidents. Burglary was the most happened crime in Newport until 2006. It reached its prime in 2004. Since then the numbers dropped steeply to less than 1500 incidents in 2008, rose to 1500 in 2009 and almost stayed the same from that year forward.
It is evident that the least occurred crime was robbery through this period and the highest incident rates after 2006 belonged to car theft.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-14 anazari 78 view
Essays by user anazari :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...ween 2003 and 2012. Two of these crimes hadnt change much during this time span while...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6303030303 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03513671552 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0602155058 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8888888889 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171492510504 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762116988893 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859061237223 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12361186184 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983851406661 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.