Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Nowadays, there is a different view of the issue about whether students should have to question which they learn or not. Depending on personal experiences and beliefs, we may find that some people hold the opinion that asking questions which students learn is a very good way to let them learn much well, which others have an opposite attitude that in the basic level of education, students should not question which they are taught. As far as I concerned, I disagree with the statement of the topic. The following discussion will explore my view.
First of all, the development of civilization is from questioning things learned by human or exist around us. According to the research conducted by the Executive Yuan in my country, students who would ask more questions than others from in school will perform much great in the test, because asking questions which especially come from students learning processes will help students keep much more knowledge in the brain and think the essence of knowledge. This phenomenon is not rare that many countries have the same researches, only have little difference.
On the other hand, the origin of any thinking is always from presenting meaningful questions. However, the students in the state of basic development of the education are hard to propose the questions which are meaningful and help them to process some advancing thinking. They do not understand which questions they should ask, which information they should rethink, and which situation they could ask their questions. In such a phase, students should follow teachers because if the knowledge is the ocean, and students are boats, teachers just like the directors who lead students to sail on the right paths. In contrast, letting students ask questions in the wrong stages which just like giving them sharp knives when they are still young. Such would possible to harm their development.
In fact, asking and following both have its own advantages and disadvantages, and none of them is the best. We should take different approaches depending on the different stages. The development of human's society, of course, is in a series of accepting, criticizing and developing, repeatedly. Therefore, in the good environment and the well-developed thinking, we would encourage students to ask more questions.
In conclusion, despite the fact that asking questions is helpful to learning, there are still many factors we should consider discreetly, Therefore, we cannot presumptuously believe the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | atharva1996 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Kiran1901 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | ifxcuo | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 66
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called 80
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- "The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has b 54
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, of course, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24813895782 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81254754332 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51364764268 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.86655537 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258632582249 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751204862551 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726960663274 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139649382535 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806130721452 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.