All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what the field of history is.
Individuals have been learning a lot from the history of mankind. In this regard, while some people hold in the opinion that history course should be required in order to be graduated, others believe that students should take courses which align with their interests. As far as I am concerned, history courses should not be obligatory for everyone because not only do not students, who are not interested, learn and memorize it very well, but they also waste their times instead of learning the lesson preparing them for their future job.
First and foremost, taking history courses should not be required for all students, because whenever a person does not this course cannot learn it deeply. In other words, they just one to pass the exam due to being graduated not learn it with pleasure. As a matter of fact, the fewer people are interested in a subject, the less their mind would be concentrated on. Take my personal experience as an example. When I was a high school, I loved to be a civil engineer. Having this on my mind, I got the top marks in math and physics. On the other hand, I had to pass the geography and history courses in order to graduate. Because of not being capable of memorizing the names as good as possible, I hated those lessons. Accordingly, it would take a lot of time from me to memorize and remember them which it is not useful for me at all. Besides, it gave me less opportunity to study math and physics, which I really liked them so much. In fact, I was too boring for me to read them, and I took low grades on them. Had I not passed the courses which I was not interested in them, I would have taken courses like art that I am more talented in them, and, as a result, the average of my marks could be upper.
Last but not least, when all students have to study history, they cannot use it in their lives. For more clarification, knowing about history, persons would not be knowledgeable in the field of their works. On the other hand, by being more educated in the field of their major, they would be more qualified for their career. For instance, a dentist, who knows the history of the world, is not equally a talented and adept one in his occupation. Having learned the lessons matching with their field, they could be more educated and accomplished which make them ready to work better. Furthermore, they can allocate more time on their related courses in theirs instead of spending so much time in the lessons that they would forget it easily.
All in all, by taking all the reasons and examples mentioned into account, history course should not be obligatory for all students because it can be waste of time and energy for whom are not interested in it. To put it another way, who can remember the courses which did not like them?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-13 | Azadehyousefi | 70 | view |
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what the field of history is. 70
- Summarise the reading and listening 3
- Movies and televisions have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- Young people make decisions based on their parents. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, really, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5119047619 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43567730529 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4632513415 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8695652174 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9130434783 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78260869565 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296548340775 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921077646822 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944004780077 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222427444757 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676269700259 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.