As people rely more and more on technology, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In today’s world we depend on technology to a great extent. Not only it makes our lives easier and comfortable but also increases the productivity of an individual. However, the speaker here asserts that dependence on technology has made ourselves incapable of doing complex tasks and hence, deteriorate our thinking abilities. Humans are not able to think creatively due to relying in technology. In my view, I feel that technology not always limits our abilities to think in a different manner rather it urges us to think in creative and effective ways.
Technology helps us to perform complex tasks in our everyday lives which otherwise, without its existence would have made them tedious and arduous. Consider the example of a SUV car which we use to commute to our workplace which saves us a considerable amount of time or the example of a washing machine which aids us to wash our clothes daily thus, eliminating the human labor and making our lives comfortable. As a result, a considerable amount of time is saved and less human efforts are needed. This enables humans to think for themselves and take care of their health and ensure their well-being rather than doing the monotonous routine work daily.
Consider how humans would have built computers and mobile phones using silicon transistors or develop various operating systems using programming languages that would work along with these hardware components and make our everyday work easier and more comfortable. All these required the evolution of technology by which such wonderful machines could be launched in the market and led to an era digital revolution. Development of such advanced technologies always need scientific and creative method of thinking. Therefore, as we demand more of technological inventions, thinking process is enhanced that too in a creative and an innovative manner.
Also, technology sometimes brings in new and complex problems in everyday life. To deal with those, we have to think beyond our boundaries and bring in an effective solution. For instance, excessive use of automobiles in everyday life which burns more and more fuel and thus, resulting in emission of pollutants to the environment causing pollution. Such problems urge humans to think from the point of view to protect the environment by reducing pollution rather than thinking about the benefits of automobiles in daily life.
However, too much dependence on technology also limits the thinking abilities of an individual. For instance, humans use calculator to perform mathematical calculations in everyday life. To the extent that even simple calculations are performed using calculator. As a result, problem solving abilities are deteriorated and thus, we limit to think for ourselves. Also, children these days have become excessively dependent on technology. For instance, addiction to mobile phones and video games have affected their focus to concentrate on themselves and thus, they become incapable to think of themselves.
Hence, I conclude by stating that technology does not completely deteriorate abilities of humans to think rather it enhances them by breaking the boundaries and think in a different and effective manner. But, sometimes too much dependency also restricts the ability of humans to think of themselves. It is upon them how they make use of technology in this digital revolution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 74
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 38
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves socially and culturally. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different manner" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ot always limits our abilities to think in a different manner rather it urges us to think in creative...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...us and arduous. Consider the example of a SUV car which we use to commute to our ...
^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...sider the example of a SUV car which we use to commute to our workplace which saves...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, as a result, in my view, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2856.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32835820896 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94115072126 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466417910448 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 924.3 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2231621074 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223740767322 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676568700372 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639532708279 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125253089131 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331755152317 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.