the government should provide care and financial support to the retire people, others, consider that it is entirely the responsibility of themselves. discuss both views and give your own opinion .
It is well said that money is not god but not less than god. Presently, it is reckned by some masses that administrator must confer financial assistance to the retire people. By contrast, others have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account both the view points.
There are manifold points to support my point of view. First and foremost, retire people can relish their life if government give monetary after retirement . To illustrate, they can not only visit numerous prominent places with family members but also manage personal expenses easily if they get pecuinary from the government. Moreover, after retirement old people faces many health problems which require a hefty amount of money for treatment. Thus, it is the duty of government to furnish them proper care and money. On the other side, opposite wind is also there.
To begin with, folks opine that administrator already invest a large amount of money on distinct types of facility such as accommodation, transportation, health, education and many more. Therefore, government can face extra burden if financial endorsement issue to the retire people. Apart from it, retired people get a handsome salary during their working and they can save money easily for further future. Thence, it is necessary for retire people to take care themselves of their personal belongings.
To recapitulate, Undeniably, monetary will uplift the living standard of retire people. However, still I ponder that retire people have to save some money while doing job rather than expecting from administrator.
- the diagram below shows the information about the amount of money spend on alocol and drugs summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 68
- The charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 84
- while recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion with relevant example 74
- the table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who roads bicycle in 2011. 61
- the given graph show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tor must confer financial assistance to the retire people. By contrast, others have confli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st, others have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account both the view po...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...overnment give monetary after retirement . To illustrate, they can not only visit ...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...urden if financial endorsement issue to the retire people. Apart from it, retired people g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
...people to take care themselves of their personal belongings. To recapitulate, Undeniably, monet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28915662651 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74291815408 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646586345382 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6040330509 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3125 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165917166594 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573898866421 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517218984578 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100410039838 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194990380332 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.