Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is obviously true that the more modern the society is, the more traffic and transportation woes are. While it is said that the migration of people from outer edge to within the city should be considered a plausible solution, I totally disagree with this notion for the reason below. At the same time, I will suggest some reasonable solutions.
First of all, city is regarded as the heart of the city. It means that a lot of choose this place to settle down. Thus, overcrowding and overpopulation are really inevitable. If the migration currents entering the cities increase, many issues such as unemployment, the shortage of housing and so on will arise. In general, it seems that this solution is taking us to a dead end instead of completely solving the problem.
Therefore, something should be done to address this before it is too late. Firstly, the government ought to upgrade the road facilities in both cities and rural areas to eliminate bottlenecks which hamper traffic flow. Dwellers need to be encouraged to utilize public vehicles such as bus, metro and so on so that the number of conveyance will decrease especially during peak hours. The Construction Department must have serious sense of work in lieu of the irresponsible working attitude which can lead to tragic accidents of citizens due to low-qualified road or broken bridge.
To sum up, I think that it is not a good idea to stimulate people to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. Everybody should have responsibility for improving traffic system so that wherever people are living, it does not have traffic problems anymore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | erman.duran95 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | erman.duran95 | 73 | view |
- Vietnam society has changed significantly in the past few decades However a lot of traditional values have been lost which is a pity Do you agree or disagree with this statement 60
- In many Western countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children What are the advantages and disadvantages of having no children 75
- Many graduates nowadays are finding it difficult to get a job Why do you think this is How can this problem be solved 96
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Violence among school students seems to be increasing. Write a paragraph to suggest what should be done to help solve this problem 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, i think, in general, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95970695971 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84332150545 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5013166371 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272725673463 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730638316023 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852740848614 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155205612356 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107937080348 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.