Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is undeniable that the growing number of vehicles and global pollution problems has a significant impact on our daily life. International experts have proposed many solutions to tackle these issues. Personally, I disagree with a view that raising the price of petrol is the best way to alleviate the traffic volume on road as well as environmental problems.
There is a number of reasons why considering the increase in petrol price fails to be the best solution, especially in the long run. It is true that private car use is one of the main cause of exhaust emissions, which results in air pollution, global warming or greenhouse effect. However, higher petrol cost is not likely to limit the numbers of drivers so long due to the increasing transporting demand. The second reason is the influence of this policy on the cost of public transport. The raising on the cost of some popular public transport like bus, tram or taxi can generally lead to the inconvenience of commuters who get familiar with this.
On the other hand, I believe that international bodies may have various alternative measures which could be implemented to confront these issues. First and foremost, governments must allocate resources to the development of alternative energy sources and cleaner fuels, which used to power motor vehicles and machinery in factory production. In recent time, for example, the availability of electric cars would be a more effective strategy in improving air quality, especially in big cities and urban. However, traffic congestion will not be solved by changing the habit of private vehicles users. As of result, the second solution is improving the choice of public transport services available to travelers. One good illustration of this is the efficiency of sky trains and underground train systems in some developed countries are effectively reducing the traffics on roads. Long-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and affordable alternatives to driving the own car for long journeys.
Last but not least, as part of the wider effort to achieve sustainable development, international cooperation to share scientific knowledge and experiences should be a top priority. There are some debatable issues such as the exploitation of renewable energy or using advances in technology that supports policymakers some solutions to deal with traffic and environmental issues in their countries.
In conclusion, for the reasons I mentioned above, long-term traffic and pollution reduction would possibly depend on educating the citizens to use public transport more and on governments using public money to construct efficient systems and organize helpful programs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 84
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and measures could be taken to solve them? 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37411764706 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02235637579 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3384289764 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6111111111 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141807612697 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043848780955 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494769123209 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075119247981 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449862676745 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.