Universities should accept equal numbers of men and women in every subject.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Most of the countries are trying to achieve equal rights for both genders, different techniques are introduced to fight inequality. One of prepositions is to accept equal amount of both genders in every subject of higher education institutions. This essay will argue why introduced proposal to have equal numbers of sexes would not change existing situation.
Firstly, people who support idea of equal numbers of both genders in every subject would not influence existing pay gap between men and women. Nowadays in many countries proportionately greater amount of women studies in universities, but women still earn less than man. For example, in Lithuanian universities proportion of men and women studying equals around 60 percent women to 40 percent men. Nevertheless, women are facing “glass ceiling” - very little amount of women are in high positions - in government or having highest leading positions in various companies. In many countries exist even stronger gender gap, the issue is countries attitude towards women.
Secondly, having equal amount of women and men is every subject would make not a natural choices for humans. For a reason, that biologically men and women are different. Women are usually more caring and man takes more risk. For example, this is well illustrated that there is more women working as a nurses and more men choosing to be engineers. People preference what to study can not be mechanically based on quota, that makes little sence to force on people something what does not come naturally.
This essay argued why equal numbers of both genders in each study subject would not help to reach gender equality concept. In my opinion, changes needs to be done systemically and people attitude needs to change towards women.
- The bar graph below shows the literacy levels of males and females in rural and urban India in 2013 2015 and 2017 86
- You are applying for a job and you need a letter of reference. Write a letter to a former boss. 78
- The pie chart below show how the city of Hertofordshire funded its public libraries over two financial terms. 84
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
...re in high positions - in government or having highest leading positions in various companies....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'choice'?
Suggestion: choice
... every subject would make not a natural choices for humans. For a reason, that biologic...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different. Women are usually more caring and man takes more risk. For example, th...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are more women'?
Suggestion: there are more women
... example, this is well illustrated that there is more women working as a nurses and more men choosi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25352112676 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76419334157 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0788245166 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27264407686 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099196065382 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600965242997 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167630592092 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251553014463 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.