TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Personal characteristic of all people is affected by some factors such as education, environment, and family. Whether one cannot be a leader is a highly debatable point. Some people strongly believe that leadership comes naturally. However, I believe that one can be a leader by learning and practicing. The following reasons would be elaborated on the thesis.
First of all, people have an immense amount of ability to learn everything. It would not be too great an exaggeration to say that today, due to improving education, many people can learn how they can behave as a leader. In fact, leadership does not come naturally and education play a crucial role to help people to behave like a leader. For example, simple students or younger people enhance their knowledge about management via education and they will be a good manager in each company. There are no doubt many more examples, but this is one important key to being a leader.
In addition, practicing has a direct influence on improving ability. To clarify, practice is one of the most important skill to improve leadership ability. Broadly speaking, since doing each difficult task every day can convert this difficult task to simple in the future if people practice and behave like a leadership every day, they will gain opportunities and will be a leader in the future. For instance, the manager of some companies by practicing management at a low-level of the company can enhance their management ability to work in the big company. All in all, the role of the practice to convert simple people to the leader is enormous.
In conclusion, although there are many who believe that leadership comes naturally. I disagree. I think today each impossible things will possible by education. I strongly believe that practicing each skill can able each people to work as a leader in huge companies even if they are not leadership naturally.
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... as education, environment, and family. Whether one cannot be a leader is a highly deba...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...one important key to being a leader. Whats more, practicing has a direct influence...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ible things will possible by education. I strongly believe that practicing each s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03785488959 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84953224437 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488958990536 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1639417573 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7222222222 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182983845532 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702401052587 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596654509267 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133188481349 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668229274232 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.