Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Along history, the role that States and governments should have has been a contentious issue. While libertarians thinkers argue that the State should not participate in human actions, socialists believe that a bigger State is better for societies. One specific topic of this discussion is the recommendation that many people do in which nations who have hungried or unemployed people, should suspend all kind of art funding. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the suggestion. I will defend my thesis with three reasons.
To begin, the most important goal that governments should pursue is the elimination of poverty. That is to say, they should not spend money in superfial things like arts. Although arts are important for human development, avoid hungry and unemployment is more important. For instance, we have the case of Argentina. The socialist government of Kirchner run the country between 2003 to 2015. In those years, private jobs did not increase. The poverty rate had an averge value of 30% every year. This government increased the spending and the taxes at the largest values in all Argentinian history. However, the did not stop funding the arts. In every holiday, you could see a lot of rock bands playing in front of the government House. They used to receive a big payment from the government. This example shows that the money used to funding this band could have been used to reduce taxes and make companies to contract more employees.
Addionaly, the government should not funding the arts because arts will not flourish with the intervention of government. Take for instance the previous examples. One the priviliged musians who received goverment funding in argentina was a singer called Fito Paez. He received money just to sing the same old songs all the time. Since he had that fix amount of money, he did not have the need of sell new compositions. Therefore, he did not realease any new album along the years of funding. This explains why government funding of the arts will not help the arts at all. Also, it will not help to stop the creation of new poor people.
On the other hand, some may argue that those artist who have not the enough money to start the career as painters or as musicians should receive money from the government. Although this could be a good idea just for some time, is the country has a lot of poor or unemployed people, the first goal of the government should be help that people because a person who does not eat is a person who cannot developt his brain. Consequently, he or she will not have the chance to create art at all. This is the case of poor people in Zambia. This people have received a lot of musical instruments from the fundation of Bill and Melinda Gates. However, they are still poor and without the possibility of have good jobs which allow they to buy their food. So, although this was a good action, it have not helped this people really.
To conclude, the main problem that a government should solve is the alimentation hungried people given them the chance of good jobs. Without that, it is imposible to apply any policy which funds the arts. For the reasons mentioned, I strongly agree with the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | AC1990 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station: "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the com 46
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 54
- The following appeared as part of a recommendation from the financial planning office to the administration of Fern Valley University In the past few years Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications 59
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should c 66
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'fund'
Suggestion: fund
... Addionaly, the government should not funding the arts because arts will not flourish...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this artist' or 'those artists'?
Suggestion: this artist; those artists
... On the other hand, some may argue that those artist who have not the enough money to start ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 534, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...s is the case of poor people in Zambia. This people have received a lot of musical i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 786, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...So, although this was a good action, it have not helped this people really. To co...
^^^^
Line 7, column 802, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s was a good action, it have not helped this people really. To conclude, the main...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2646.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78481012658 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55996559921 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473779385172 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 6.24550561798 336% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.716211734 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.37142857143 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205184220695 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049380423372 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528449433503 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132107440365 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540566853629 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.