The ability to learning more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or dis agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more languages and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of language developments is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that future life can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the important language can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the second language, as well as mother tongue, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of languages. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both studying the different language and learning the grammar apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the future language might increase the consequences of communication developments. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the written language could relate to this reality that demerits of the formal language pertain to learning the essential vocabulary. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of dying the language is correlated negatively with the new language. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the English language.
To conclude, While there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the ability to learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the international languages prove the significance of learning facilities, but also pinpoint future communication implications.
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 93
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To extent do ypu agree or dis agree? Discuss. 85
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree 88
- The university will deduct the students' score for late assignments. Opinion and solutions? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65037593985 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26213776023 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5917171354 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178588567626 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594628129386 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399546788893 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101820139242 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018312839215 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.