The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the population rates in India and China over 50 consecutive years from 2000 to 2050 measured in billions.
Overall, it can be seen that population in India increases dramatically over the given period while population in China grows for sometime and then the prediction for future is that the population will decline.
In 2000, population in India stood at 1000 at the same time China’s population accounted for approximately 1250. Then population in both countries rise steadily over the next 30 years, and it is forecasted that in 2030 year the population in both countries will be equal at about 1450, and it will be the highest number of population in China.
It is projected that there will be a slight decline in the population in China and in 2050 it will constitute 1400, while population in India will rise gradually to finish the period at about 1600.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-22 | corincic1 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | dhavaljo15 | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | mifas meleraroth | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Bhimani Nikunj | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1994 and 2004. 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two maps show the developments which small fishing village and surrounding area experienced over a period of 30 years between 1974 and 2004. 56
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 73
- the diagram below shows the process of distilling salty water into fresh water 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94078947368 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80518632017 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5484006447 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284147760294 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185815629464 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438522384618 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200159687899 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384489594731 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.