Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend. Give our opinion and examples from your experience.
As taxes we pay, plays an increasingly more central role in developing nation, it has been suggested, that there has been incline in spending a good pile of money to save wild life. I found this as a untruthful happening by many governments, moreover this is a worrying trend that looks set to continue.
Even though, protecting animals is one of the major issues, it would be completely foolish, not to recognize other aspects of country which are plaguing issues’ for citizens. Most of the underdeveloped countries are facing evil issues such as hunger-deaths, basic medical-aid, education, dwellings and even some countries have scarcity of water. It can be seen in increasing number of hunger-deaths in Africa, despite the amount they spend on saving wild life sanctuaries. Spending a huge chunk of taxes from governmental reserve which is often considered as hard-earned money of people on maintaining wild-life can produce disturbing inevitable by-products.
Nevertheless, some species need to be saved for maintaining ecological balance. If these extinct the others which are supposed to be prey on these will decline, as a consequence there will be an imbalance in nature. Take Honey-Bees, for Example, in recent years the growths of these species have been increased and as a result the production of global honey is increased predominantly. In addition to this, researchers found that, if bees are going to extinct, then there will be no human in seven days. So, saving an animal group which helps environment is vital. It will be completely preposterous to squander money on wild-life which doesn’t create a huge impact food-chain. Instead allocating money on advancements of technology and science that could mitigate global problems.
Despite there is a growth in care of saving wild-life by spending tax-payers money, the species which is to be saved is still debatable. It would be more helpful to the country, if they allocate that amount to public facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-12 | javaduddupudi | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it s best to encourage children to leave family home as soon as possible Others believe children should stay at their family home for as long as they like Discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
- People are sleeping less than in the past Why do people do it What are the effects of this 31
- Nowadays the use of social media such as Facebook, Twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one-on-one conversations in person. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give your opinion and examples from your own 100
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past Give the cause 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oney to save wild life. I found this as a untruthful happening by many government...
^
Line 5, column 684, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...apos;t create a huge impact food-chain. Instead allocating money on advancements of tec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, well, even so, for example, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26332288401 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09648374674 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583072100313 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7455810511 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.933333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838157732336 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306703240478 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314645449373 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586132582565 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023692827403 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.