With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree?
It is thought by some that face to face communication may extinct in the future as more and more people prefer to communicate through the web or messages. In my opinion, while many people choose internet for communication, I do not believe that it will replace face to face communication.
Firstly, it is common for people to talk with each other using the internet as it gives to people an opportunity to stay in touch despite far distances between them. For instance, the internet can help family members to stay in touch when one of them is outside of the home country, they can talk or even see each other using the web. People can expand their network, people from different countries have an opportunity to get to know people from distant countries.
However, while people can support relationships through the internet they still require face to face communication. Take, for example a couple who have a relationships, they will not be able to have a healthy relationships without face to face communication. They will not be able to build a family, through the internet, the couple can just support their relationships when they far from each other. Moreover, public servants will always need to have face to face meetings with public or with public officials from other countries, as it is impossible to make serious decision without face to face meeting.
In conclusion, I believe that people will always prefer to have face to face communication while in some cases internet and text messages can be useful for communicating.
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of East Africa. 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced. 61
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people says trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be build instead.Do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a relationship' or simply 'relationships'?
Suggestion: a relationship; relationships
...on. Take, for example a couple who have a relationships, they will not be able to have a health...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relationship'?
Suggestion: relationship
...they will not be able to have a healthy relationships without face to face communication. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...ace to face communication while in some cases internet and text messages can be usefu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93076923077 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8698700051 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469230769231 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.7030362506 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.2 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250354218264 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122094331263 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759884870343 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18486954141 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817089459549 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.