The chart below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addtion to English in 2000 and 2010
The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of British students of an England university who had ability to speak another languages besides English in 2000 and 2010. Overall, the majority of students could fluently ace in Spanish in comparison with others in both years.
In 2000, there were 20 percentage of English students in the university speaking no other language except for English which made up the second biggest number of students. The figures of individuals in the college who were able to speak German only and two other languages were on the same scale, which was 10%. That of French spoken people was also equal to that of another language spoken ones, with 15%. Over a decade, the number of student speaking no other language decreased considerably into 10% in 2000. While, the percentage of Spanish only spoken students slightly grew up from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010. The proportion of students speaking another language in 2010 also increased into 20% which took the second largest number of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | minhtrieutr | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The plans below show the layout of an university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 61
- The diagram below shows how geotherml energy is used to produce electricity 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecreased considerably into 10% in 2000. While, the percentage of Spanish only spoken ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99418604651 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54363621243 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4953395312 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413041475369 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177847268032 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107003932581 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333935010719 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00623112611036 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.