Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Developing countries are constantly struggling with the basic needs of life such as food, clothes and shelter. The health and education system is poor in the under developed countries. As people cannot fulfill their everyday needs and have to cope with lots of difficulties to overcome poverty and starvation. The government of these nations provide shelter to homeless people and try to overcome health issues by providing the health facilities. They also provide education free of cost to the people in these countries. But due to the economic burden, the government alone cannot take the responsibility and provide the whole nation with wealth to overcome poverty, as it is not possible without generating enough revenue through tax collection from the population, which in return will over burden the poor population.
However, in my opinion wealthy nations can take the responsibility of poorer nations by investing in such countries and bringing the money to developing countries. The developed countries already can provide lots of opportunities like providing education to the people from under developed and developing nations with tuition free scholarships. They can provide employment opportunities to the people of poor nation on contact basis. They can establish projects and work on it in collaboration with the poor countries. Moreover, they can also provide the government of poor nations with loans which well help in sharing the economic burden of the country.
In this way both the government of poor countries and wealthy nations can share the responsibility of economic and health crisis in developing countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-15 | Sadia Akram | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topicShould wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsi 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41568627451 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94605086281 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454901960784 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9666574023 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214796551359 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928094544563 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345301514824 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152633017479 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412540882124 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.