Everyday millions of tons of food is wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening. How can this be solved.
Wastage of food is a grave concern in today's world. This essay will discuss why large food chains are responsible for this phenomenon and how better use of technology would help mitigate this problem.
One of the pressing issues in current times is the large quantities of food that get discarded around the world, especially in countries like United States. According to a study on wastage of food conducted by University of Wales in 2016, one prime source that was identified as the key enabler for this development were the large grocery and food chains. Inefficient inventory control was causing these grocery chains to stock up on more food products than than demand required. The unused food items had to be thrown away once their expiry date was met. It was estimated that Wegmans, a grocery chain popular in the North East region of the country, was getting rid of 1 million tonnes of expired food products every year due to poor inventory management.
In order to minimize this wastage caused by poor stock control, better inventory management softwares and tools need to be built and made available to these food companies. Governments and Private institutions should invest more in the field of Operations Research with focus on inventory control which would result in tools that would aid in more efficient handling of resources by these large food chains. This would help in better stocking of food products by these companies thereby minimizing the refuse generated by them.
In summary, mega supermarkets and grocery stores are one of the prime offenders in wastage of large quantities of food due to poor inventory management. Focus on developing better and more robust inventory prediction software and tools would help alleviate this problem and aid in reducing the food wastage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: than
...hains to stock up on more food products than than demand required. The unused food items ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08417508418 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59138106285 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531986531987 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6629612712 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 7.06120827912 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185862132939 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808445479916 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560407604806 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13782461474 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071019657074 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.