The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the changes of three different types of food and the consumer-price index from 1979 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear that price of three food product groups increased, although there were fluctuations. Only the fresh fruits and vegetables rose significantly higher than others and consumer-price index in the general.
All the lines on the graph have the same starting figure in 1979. Over the period, the consumer-price index rose steadily from over 50 from 1979 to approximately 210 from 2009. It was illustrated the same trend with the prices of sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks. Despite the increase of them, they were consistently under the consumer-price index after 1897. Although there were many minor fluctuations before 1987, the number of sugar and sweets was 200 from 2009, higher than the price carbonated drinks was above 150 at the same time.
The fresh fruits and vegetables rose sharply after 1989. From the same period with other figures, it was about 60 at the beginning and finished at approximately 330 higher than the consumer-price index in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-23 | NhatPhong | 67 | view |
| 2017-07-16 | Thao Anh194 | 84 | view |
| 2017-06-15 | baonguyen3011 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of films produced by 5 different countries in 3 years. 73
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 67
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16111111111 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8418988175 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6792445131 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143314506964 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671374263201 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328058524123 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986884943729 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188690500514 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.