The best way to improve the safety of our road is to give much stricter punishment on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that giving stricter punishment on driving offenses is the best way to make our road safer. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this idea, because people are always scared of losing money and the money gathered can be used to improve facilities.
We all know that it is really hard to earn money these days, so if people are fined a large amount of money every time they break the traffic laws, they will have to be careful. My uncle, for instance, rode a bike over the speed at 70km/h in an urban area and got caught. He was fined 5 million VND, it equivalents a month of working. From then on, I never see him ride the bike over 50km/h even on the empty roads.
Moreover, the amount of money that the Government gets through punishing the driving offenses can be reused to improve roads and other facilities. It is clear that money taken from society must be used to develop society. For example, after a year of punishing people riding a bike with no helmet, Government got over $1 billion. They used that money to widen some narrow roads and built a couple of overpasses. As such, it really improved the traffic experience for society.
To conclude, for the reason mentioned above, I believe that the much stricter the punishment is, the better traffic we can get
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-13 | nguyen duc | 56 | view |
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area 61
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bike with no helmet, Government got over billion. They used that money to widen s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, really, so, then, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59051724138 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31541758458 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594827586207 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1132478 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.75 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160328276128 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624603880315 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938021580423 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112107857663 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086671697611 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.