The aging population is good for business, the economy and society. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
The aging population is believed to be good for the economy, business and society. However, some evidence shows that it has more disadvantages than advantages. This essay will discuss both views and my opinion about that argument.
It can not be denied that there are some benefits to the aging population. New jobs will be created to suit the old people and they can become a new workforce. Countries in the world which have a high number of elder such as Japan, Europe countries and so on have created new jobs for their old people. In addition, old people are not only the workforce but potential customers. There are some works that serve the elderly. For example, working in hospitals or selling products for old people.
Nevertheless, some people disagree with that belief and give some reasonable evidence. The high number of the elderly leads to the deficiency of the workforce. The aging population means fewer children will be given birth. Therefore, the number of younger decrease. Although many situations can be replaced by artificial intelligence, some still need human working. As the result, the aging population will directly influence the economy. Moreover, the need for healthcare increases and also impact on the national economy.
To sum up, I can assert that the aging population has negative effects on the economy and our society and the local authorities have to do something to tackle the increase of elderly
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-24 | NhungNtdghtn | 56 | view |
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 56
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 78
- The pie charts show the main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The pie charts show the main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 56
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 36
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06722689076 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6788408169 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575630252101 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5332940987 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9411764706 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201440506931 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608928882252 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768597087555 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136692391887 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933166709737 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.