Some people think that genetically modified ( GM) crops are positive development. Others, however argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the contemporary agriculture, growing plants have been facing up the method which is based on genetically modified crops. In turn, this method led people to think about whether it brings many advantages or has some drawbacks. This essay deals with arguments for and against this controversial issue.
Looking more closely at the view which is held by those people who in favour of this method, firstly, they believe that these crops might provide people with abundance because of being the conditions which are adapted well to grow in everywhere. Secondly, such kinds of plants resist to pests so that it does not require supplementary pesticide. Finally, fruits and vegetables which have been grew up by these modifying methods might store a long time in order to supply people regardless any season of year.
Turning to the opponent of the first view, widespread use of GM techniques are carried out some negative effects. The first one is that GM productions have not be able to prove that they are safe. For this reason, it affects to human’s heath with its influence which causes to worse a mechanism of their stomach. Another one is that it ought to cause to opt completely biological structure of some plants after every modifications, as a result of this, the next generations may not having access to use original food production.
Taking everything into the consideration, although modern farming methods require this technique, for my viewpoint, there are more potential danger which were aforementioned above rather that benefits of GM crops.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 61
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1985 and 2005 33
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The pie charts show average household expenditure in Hong Kong and Britain in the year 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd against this controversial issue. Looking more closely at the view which i...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
..., fruits and vegetables which have been grew up by these modifying methods might sto...
^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ponent of the first view, widespread use of GM techniques are carried out some ne...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rst one is that GM productions have not be able to prove that they are safe. For t...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'opting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: opting
.... Another one is that it ought to cause to opt completely biological structure of some...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.140625 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7949102736 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1563637541 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109984815842 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414760133714 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341906677699 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643904601874 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018314559279 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.