wxplain how lecture cast doubt on points made in the reading about Torreya Taxifolia survival.
The reading and the lecture is are both about the Torreya taxifolia tree’s survival. The author of the reading explains that there are three ways to stop the decline of Torreya. However, the lecture shed lights on these claims and refutes each of author’s points.
First of all, the author claims that Torreya could be reestablished by planting seeds in the northern part of Florida where it was once flourished. Microclimate of that area is suitable for its survival.The point cleared by the professor that those areas of Northern Florida are now hotter and drier than before not cooler and wetter anymore. She added that these areas are greatly affected by changes of the climate from larger area either through global warming or through wetland to florida drainage and are no longer suitable for taxifolia. As a result many of these areas are dryer which are not suitable for Torreya’s survival.
Secondly, the author points that there is a better chance of survival of Torreya plants by relocating them farther north to further northern sides where temperatures are cooler. This point made clear by the professor The professor contradicts this by giving an example of relocation of the black locust tree into more north to a new environment. She explained that black locust spreads very quickly and killed pushed out many other plants which were already in danger of extinction. So There may be unpredictable outcomes of relocation of Torrey for the new environment.
Finally, the reading states that Torreya will be survived by preserving them preserved in research centers where scientist can monitor and research on Torreya for its better protection. The professor challenged this point by saying that Torreya trees need a large and genetically diverse criteria a large, genetically diverse population required to resist diseases and these research centers do not have enough capacity to offer this atmosphere grow them. So these trees would not be capable of surviving diseases in the long-term.
In conclusion, the points made by the professor clearly refutes that reading’s claims about the three solutions for the long-term survival of Torreya Trees.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 70
- Do you agree or disagreeThere will be fewer cars on the road twenty years from now. 73
- Their is an announcement from the company for planning to build a large factory in your town.Do you agree or disagree 70
- Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they opposes specific points made in the reading passage. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... that area is suitable for its survival.The point cleared by the professor that tho...
^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter chance of survival of Torreya plants by relocating them farther north to furt...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the professor'.
Suggestion: the professor
...es are cooler. This point made clear by the professor The professor contradicts this by giving an example o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a large and genetically diverse criteria a large, genetically diverse population ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29142857143 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74049898629 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5327628332 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.466666667 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218188405797 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856473761805 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101173925001 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143840337741 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823464418703 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.