Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to have a broad knowledge of many specific academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject”. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.
Education plays an important role in human’s life. Thus, some people prefer to study different subjects to get a variety of knowledge. Others decide to spend more time learning just one subject to have a deeper understanding. From my point of view it is much better to have a broad knowledge because you would have a variety of options for your future, and it is easier to learn new skills and things, and you would be able to come up with new ideas using your broad knowledge.
First of all, people with a broad knowledge would have a lot of chances to begin their future. I think it is better to have lot of options for future and choosing several of them rather than relying on only one subject such as, chemistry. Who knows what would happen tomorrow. There might happen a sharp decrease in demands of chemists or pharmacists and what would they do? So, it is better to have a proper knowledge at least in two subjects. Moreover, the most interesting and important part of it is that even if you fail in one field you can learn from their mistakes, gain a real world and life experience which is very valuable, precious, and important, and dig in another field employing your experience.
Secondly, it is easier to learn new things and new knowledge with a broad knowledge of different subjects. You can combine your knowledge in one subject with another and grasp new things quickly and easily. For instance, my teacher who knows four different languages such as English, Portuguese, French, Spanish, and Russian learned German in two months by combining and mixing vocabulary and grammar of different languages with German. And another example is my classmate who has in-depth knowledge in physics and pharmacy studied chemistry in 5 weeks because the terminology, experiments, and things are quite similar. Therefore, it is vital to know a lot and the more you know the faster and easier you learn new things.
Last but not least, many big company and government employers look for employees with a good knowledge of different fields because the more knowledge you possess the more new ideas you can come up with. People with a concentrated and specific knowledge on one subject cannot think widely. They only focus on one thing which is not what employer want from them. However, workers with a broad knowledge can apply their mind and come up with a brand new idea which is profitable for the company to realize. Thus, these people are more successful, prosperous, and have a stable position in society.
When all is said and done, as I explained above, it is really beneficial to have or to possess knowledge of variety of subjects due to lots of possibilities for future, easiness of learning new things, and successful and stable job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-01 | Ravshan Ganiyev | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment- doing things they like to do –rather than doing things they should do.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- People attend college or university for many different reasons. Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should sometimes do things they don’t enjoy doing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- franchise 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Education plays an important role in hum...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...new ideas using your broad knowledge. First of all, people with a broad knowle...
^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on only one subject such as, chemistry. Who knows what would happen tomorrow. There...
^^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'proper knowledge'.
Suggestion: proper knowledge
...would they do? So, it is better to have a proper knowledge at least in two subjects. Moreover, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther field employing your experience. Secondly, it is easier to learn new thin...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ster and easier you learn new things. Last but not least, many big company and...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd have a stable position in society. When all is said and done, as I explaine...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hings, and successful and stable job.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, i think, such as, you know, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79831932773 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6168072624 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478991596639 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.448947688 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.761904762 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265015911199 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817714116303 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607908498402 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149714379067 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434262562363 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.