1. Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author of issue claims that there should be a law to prevent the use of wilderness area even for the financial gain. This is the assertion with which I generally do concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to rear my standpoint.
A first striking fact which should be considered is the cogent interconnection of the ecosystem at the wilderness. Indeed, wilderness hospitals numerous types of ecosystems which possess network to each other. In this case, by the abolishing a tiny part of this connection, the entire links will get down. This fact is convincingly supported by the butterfly effect. This effect firstly was discussed by the meteorologist Edward Lorenz in 1961; he proposed that the solo movement of the butterfly’s wing in a specific side of the world could cause a big storm at the other side of the world. According to this principle, the ruining of wilderness in a place will have negative side-effects at other spaces. In other word, the conscious of this destroy has a global scope side effect which is threatening for global.
Another equally crux point which should be considered is the possibility of the gaining economic benefit through the wild and natural attraction. In fact, in the current journey attraction list, the intact wilderness owns the fame among the tourists. Therefore, by the preservation of these spaces, there will be the increment of the tourists who wish to spend their time and money on visiting that place. As a result, the native people will benefit from this income. Actually, according to the noteworthy intelligence research released by the Economy Department in the Middle East Technical University, fifty-four percent of the raw income of Turkey is through the tourists who visit Turkey. So, the protection of the land can be considered as the protection of a latent source of income.
Maybe there should be the assumption that the financial benefits which gain through the allocating the wilderness for economic activities could be more than its protection. In this case, the higher benefits could make my perspective to look shaky. However, the crucial and subtle point was ignored by this assumption and it is the length of retrieving. In fact, it is the obvious fact, the duration of nature retrieving is so slower than the speed of modern life requirements. In this case, after a while, nature could be a sufficient and responsible source for these requirements. A lucid example for this assertion is the current situation of Iran which imports tree form the other countries; on the other hand, during the last decades, it had sufficient lands of the tree. The chasm consumption and cutting down of the trees by the governor make this place becomes insufficient of trees and seeks this source from the other countries. Therefore, instead of obtaining the fast and transient benefits through the wilderness, it is a wise idea to preserve it to have and a constant source of income from its tourists.
To wrap it up, according to the all aforementioned data, although the high and fast income through the demolishing the wilderness could seem appealing; the protection of the wilderness will be protective of the ecosystem in the global scope and provide the continued source of income for the citizens,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to public transportation. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past young people depended on their parents for making decisions. Today, young people are better able to make decisions on their own. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money.
- 1.The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you 66
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the execu 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inued source of income for the citizens,
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2814.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 559.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03398926655 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89310298792 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479427549195 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 855.0 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 4.38483146067 411% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7277195115 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.56 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.36 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197822349879 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587042190698 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071241683696 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118711698778 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435262482952 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.