Cane toads fast spread
The passage was about the ways of preventing cane toads spread in Australia and proposes three methods of controling them. however the lecture takes the other side nad critisize each of these methods.
The first way the article claims, is building a national fence that blocks them from going to un-affected parts of the country and states that there were similar succesful experiances controling rabbits. The profesoor in the lecture claims that this method wouldn't be succeful since streams of water will carry some of toads and their eggs and this will be enough for them to be reproduced.
Second method proposed in the passage, is organizing campaign among citizens to capture and destroy toads and their eggs. The professor states that however it is good way but it may have bad consequences. since toads will be captures by ordinary citizens who do not recognize them, in this method, many types of frogs and other endegoured species will also be destroyed and may cause them to be distinct.
The passage also avers that the scientist are developing a virus that will prevent toads from maturing and reproducing. The professor refutes this idea and claims that this will lead bad consequenses and may cause other animals to be destroyed and also it wil lead variations in the ecosystem
- Ethanol fuel as a replacement for gasoline and its consequences 60
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A person should never make an important decision alone.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 76
- Are the ancient jars batteries or not? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...poses three methods of controling them. however the lecture takes the other side nad cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...poses three methods of controling them. however the lecture takes the other side nad cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... in the lecture claims that this method wouldnt be succeful since streams of water will...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the toads') or simply say ''some toads''.
Suggestion: some of the toads; some toads
...ceful since streams of water will carry some of toads and their eggs and this will be enough ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...d way but it may have bad consequences. since toads will be captures by ordinary citi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52118800679 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9468291736 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119580542726 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574207336637 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814731106119 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860251832469 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676280651155 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.