arrests per year for using illegal drugs from 1991 to 2005
The line graph illustrates the levels of arrests per year for using illegal drugs from 1991 to 2005. Overall, it can be seen that despite fluctuating over the periof as a whole the quantity of arrests rose over 15 years.
In 1991, the levels of arrests for illegal drugs use stood at 10. However, there was a gradual increase in the number to 22 from 1991 to 1994. The figure then rose dramatically to 60 in 1995 and kept remaining stable at 60 over the following two years. 1997 to 1999 saw a steady fall in the arrests rate to 40, which was followed by a significant increase at the end of this period, with the rate reaching a peak of 70 in 2000. Next, the number of the arrests plunged to a low of 15 in 2001 and then suddenly climbed to 55 in 2002. It remained stable for the following two years, but declined gradually to 40 in 2005.
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. 67
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 73
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 682.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.23602484472 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33900211745 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2907234656 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.25 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397011961063 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191562166971 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.245772444946 0.0843802449381 291% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355614751058 0.15604864568 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124434235484 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.31 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.