The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The bar chart depicts that percentage of users who use the number of social networking sites in Canada in 2014 & 2015.
Overall, one site had the highest user in 2014 & 2015 while, had the lowest number of users used five sites during 2 years. Number of users who did not use any site was almost same through the period.
As the graph shows, there was slight decrease in the categories of no sites. From 22% in 2014 to 21% in 2015. Afterwards, 36% people used one site in 2015. But these trend for this categories experienced a declined by 8% in 2015 that was the most popular among dwellers. The number of users for two sites categories remained similar, around at 23% in 2014 and 24% in 2015.
Furthermore, before witnessing a rise, the proportion for three sites users accounted for about 12% in 2014. Meantime, in terms of four sites, it had only 5% user in 2014 while it increased slightly to 8% in 2015. Lastly, only 2% used five sites in 2014 and growth of number in 2015 with 2% in 2015. Hence, these categories had the lowest user over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 61
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 78
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000. 73
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 50
- Some people say taxes should be spent on health care. Other people say that there are more important priorities for tax-payers' money. Discus both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d one site in 2015. But these trend for this categories experienced a declined by 8%...
^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of four sites, it had only 5% user in 2014 while it increased slightly to 8% i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, lastly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49484536082 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30135410947 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4471976749 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6666666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374856760804 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159286081202 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130989656075 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282134027674 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112383419777 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.