The chart gives information about UK immigration, emigration and net migration between 1999
and 2008.
The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008.
Overall, the figures for immigration were always higher than emigration, but both rates rose over 10 years. Besides, the net of migration fluctuated throughout the periods.
The number of immigration and emigration increased steadily from 450,000 and 300,000 people in 1999 to reach a peak of 600,000 and around 360,000 people in 2006, respectively. While the figure for immigration decreased slightly to just below 600,000 people in 2008, the number of emigration dropped suddenly to 350,000 people in 2007 before grew again to the highest point 420,000 people in 2008.
From 1999 to 2003, the net migration stayed between 150,000 and 180,000 people. In the last 5 years, except the figure was 150,000 people in 2008, the other number always were higher than 200,000 and reached a peak of 250,000 people in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | quanglnd31 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached a peak of 250,000 people in 2004.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07453416149 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45958027435 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6823105568 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15088071248 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101497513129 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101110738158 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131681307974 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107999610217 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.