The graph shows the attendance for different types of events in the Grandville Stadium by 2017. Meanwhile, the chart gives the attendance projected for 2020 and 2030, where is we can see an increase of viewers for the next 10 years.

Essay topics:

The graph shows the attendance for different types of events in the Grandville Stadium by 2017. Meanwhile, the chart gives the attendance projected for 2020 and 2030, where is we can see an increase of viewers for the next 10 years.

The graph shows the attendance for different types of events in the Grandville Stadium by 2017. Meanwhile, the chart gives the attendance projected for 2020 and 2030, where is we can see an increase of viewers for the next 10 years.

Firstly, the sports events are the most popular type of presentation with the highest attendance of the chart. For the 2017, this event reached almost 150 thousands tickets sales, while the projection for 2030 present a gradually increase over to 215. 000 thousands attendance.

On the other hand, are the concerts, which have the second attendance of the chart, but between the 2017 and 2030, this type of event presents a strongly increase of public. The projection of growth for 2030 is five times the rates presented by 2017, passing to 25 thousands person to 125 thousands.

However, the third group of activities, theater, will has an significantly increase by 2030. Despite of it will continue en the last posicion of attendance, it will climb his attendance four times more than 2017 and will reach almost 50 thousands of tickets sales.

Overall, the projected annual attendance shows an improve for all types of events.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-27 Camila Figueroa 78 view
Essays by user Camila Figueroa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
..., while the projection for 2030 present a gradually increase over to 215. 000 thousands attendance. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('strongly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...7 and 2030, this type of event presents a strongly increase of public. The projection of growth for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...hird group of activities, theater, will has an significantly increase by 2030. Desp...
^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... group of activities, theater, will has an significantly increase by 2030. Despite...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... group of activities, theater, will has an significantly increase by 2030. Despite of it will continue en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '50 thousand'.
Suggestion: 50 thousand
...es more than 2017 and will reach almost 50 thousands of tickets sales. Overall, the projecte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., the projected annual attendance shows an improve for all types of events.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63932731055 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2005924129 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.610952910553 0.215688989381 283% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251936853866 0.103423049105 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.232471147664 0.0843802449381 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37838569304 0.15604864568 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.31987104764 0.0819641961636 390% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.