More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation» Describe some of the problems of over reliance on car, and suggest at least one possible solution.
The modes of transportation are evolving drastically in the past few years. Due to this, an increasing number of people becoming dependent on private vehicles as their superior means of travelling. What could be the reasons for this phenomenon? How could this be solved by suggesting some alternatives? An extensive scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
Although we have had confronted an abundance of issues and their remedies until now, in this case, I would like to present a balanced ergo objective assessment.
I opine that some situations are resulting in commuting by private means. However, we can recommend a few solutions for this behaviour. The subsequent two paragraphs will details both aspects thoroughly.
The foremost reason is that public transportation are unreliable due to punctuality issues. Hence, people for whom time is crucial, prefer to avoid these transportation means. Additionally, an easy availability of cars gives an opportunity to travel as per an individual’s convenience. For Instance, If I have flexible office hours, I can travel by my vehicle in off-peak hours, whereas, otherwise, I would have to commute as per the common commute schedules.
A possible resolution for the above challenges is improvement in the punctuality of shared transports. Furthermore, frequency of buses or trains needs to be increased. So that, the crowd will be divided and travellers will not be reluctant to take buses or trains. For instance, if thousands of employees are travelling in the morning by few means of transportation then increasing the number of vehicles would lessen the burden on public properties as well.
Keeping all of above-mentioned facts in mind, irregular transport options are obvious components of our reality. On the other hand, approaches such as enhancements in frequency of the trains or buses could play a pivotal role. In conclusion, there are sufficient evidences for critical problems. However, there are adequate(sufficient) measures for the resolution of challenges.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-27 | essayevaluation | 78 | view |
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. 73
- Some people think that parents have the greatest influence on their child’s academic development, while others think that a child’s teacher has more influence.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 56
- During recent plane journey, you sat next to the businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested that you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants.Write a letter to that person.Remind him when and w 78
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places. How it has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages of relying too much on it. 84
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'detail'
Suggestion: detail
...our. The subsequent two paragraphs will details both aspects thoroughly. The foremos...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 339, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'few means'.
Suggestion: few means
...loyees are travelling in the morning by few means of transportation then increasing the n...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3464709674 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576802507837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3612143504 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1904761905 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981604206823 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284444944464 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336492186282 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467401624997 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274456629512 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.