The figure below is a town planning map. Showing the likely position of new
shopping centers as well as the various different zones and major transportation
route of the town.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
Given is the map comparing two possible locations for a new urban shopping complex in terms of the distance to distinct areas and main transport route.
It is noticeable from the information provided that the shopping center A is likely to be in the residential zone while the countryside will be chosen for the shopping center B’s position. And both constructions are easily accessed by different means of transportation.
Looking at the location of Shopping mall A, it is designed to mainly meet the demand of the suburb’s citizens as it is situated in the center of the town, close to the Business district. There is a close distance between this mall and the Industrial zone in the eastern of the map. Additionally, it is particularly convenient to reach this mall by cars as it is next to the main road.
Regarding the other likely position, shopping B is planned to be situated far away from the downtown, in the rural area. However, it is in the vicinity of the other town, which is 15km from this town’s district. Interestingly, train passengers find it closer to get there as no traffic is allowed in the central district.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-16 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | Diem Hang 1612 | 80 | view |
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 11
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills.To what extent you agree or disagree? 67
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average. Summaries the given information and show comparison which relative 78
- Some people believe that children should do what their parents tell them to do; others think children must learn to think for themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84771573604 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97934518302 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9178168086 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166579901111 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637597681833 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376020724571 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921487032221 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261922794549 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.