A poor infrastructure hinders under-developed countries from progressing and modernizing. Some people think that this should be the first problem tackled by foreign aid.
The paucity of resources such as financial aid and development plan are hindering the infrastructure constructions in many of the poor countries. While few individuals feel this should be the fundamental problem solved by foreign investment, this essay will explain why I completely agree with this notion.
To embark on, the cardinal focus of infrastructure development needs to begin with construction of roads. This is because they connect major cities with nearby suburbs and countryside. For instance, if there are good roadways, it will be easy to commute. As a result, trade such as cargo will grow rapidly; generating employment and consistent revenue. Furthermore, there should be more of multi-purpose buildings in major towns and cities. The primary advantages of such buildings are that it creates opportunities to run local businesses or invite global brands to start their franchises, provide leisure and entertainment facilities.
Another pivotal basic structure in any under-developed or developing economies is public transport. This is important because the majority of population in these countries are financially poor. As a consequence, they can not afford to own a private vehicle. Therefore, government should attract foreign direct investments to construct and operate transport systems like metro rail, trams, and tubes in collaboration with central government. Moreover, to a certain extent, foreign investments should be permitted in real estate for construction of basic housing, which improves the quality of life index of a country.
In conclusion, from my perspective, foreign capital should be encouraged in poor countries for development of infrastructure such as road ways, multi-utility buildings, public transportation - by investing in real estate as well. Due to this, a country's infrastructure can be enhanced to improve overall standard of living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | A VATSAL KUMAR | 84 | view |
- With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with thi 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with? 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people travelling, there is a growing demand for flights.What problems does this have on the environment?What measures could be taken to solve the problems? 89
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72340425532 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35498923285 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0861480074 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303399037835 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895713385344 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068920382652 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196427242638 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789774247744 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.