Charts
The given pie charts illustrate proportions of energy production types in France in 1995 and 2005. Overall, it is apparently seen that during all the period the most preferred types of energy were gas, coal and petrol, while the least popular ones were nuclear energy and others.
Taking a closer look at the first chart (1995), it can be observed that coal was the most popular kind with the number slightly below of 30% of the total number. It is followed by gas and petrol energy, which are less by a tiny fraction by even lower than 1 per cent. As for the petrol, it has just over 6% of production. The smallest fraction in the market where other types of energy.
Turning tho the chart of 2005, it can be seen that cool stood as the pioneer, even with a slight increase by a percent. Similarly, Similarly, gas experienced a minor growth, while the rate of petrol in the energy market saw a dramatic decline by nearly 10%, staying at slightly less than a fifth of the total number. Regarding the remaining part of the share, both nuclear and other types of energy raised to about 10% and 9% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-15 | Shawn Mendes | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...riod the most preferred types of energy were gas, coal and petrol, while the least p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, look, regarding, similarly, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54726368159 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36290650373 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577114427861 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1971085622 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137338435483 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614528219136 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08858889905 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992470997572 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00719115134277 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.