An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Vitamin A deficiency can lead to many diseases like night blindness, cornea formation, weak sight, etc. When the deficiency among people is in large scale, it is the responsibility of the government to take certain actions that would help decrease the deficiency among people.
Though the government is ready to implement the new breed of millet engineered by the international development organisation in response to this problem, it is important that both the government and organisation work not only on the pros but also on the cons of the new breed of millet.
The first question that needs to be addressed is, if the new breed of millet which is rich in Vitamin A is actually giving the results it promises to. This needs to tested before implementing because if the purpose is not fulfilled then the government and the farmers would incur huge losses for growing the crop in large scale.
The second question that needs to be addressed is, if there are any side effects caused due to the consumption of the new breed of millet. It is very important to take this into consideration as the side effects might lead to much dangerous and harmful results. It is very important to be aware of all types of effects it has on the human body.
The third question that needs to be addressed is about the strength of the crop and all the climatic conditions and other requirements needed by it. Studying these aspects, would help the farmers grow the crop more profitably than the traditional farming methods.
Thus, comprehensive study on the new breed of millet is necessary to answer the questions which in turn will help decide if the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 83
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 33
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1375 1500
No. of Different Words: 144 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.725 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.753 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.884 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.415 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.783 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, then, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 291.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85910652921 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77829897922 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508591065292 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9979338432 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.545454545 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316849486634 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105698074242 0.0743258471296 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742390212669 0.0701772020484 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148319056174 0.128457276422 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668026806714 0.0628817314937 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.