The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The supplied bar chart enumerates the comparison of the triple reasons that caused harm to land in four separate regions. As is observed, africa and asia are the most severe areas where the destruction of soil occurs by these particular factors
it is apparently seen that breeding in africa destroys 500 million hectares meanwhile tree-cuting in this place is well beneath with 300 million is harmed. farming practice in this area is the reason for spoiling 300 million hectares of land. asia saw a balance figures with different factors where all three data compared account for around 400 million hectares damaged soil
Now turning the details to the other two parts of the world which are australia and Europe. it can be noticed that in both region tree-cutting and farming are among the least harmful factor to land which only damage no more than 100 million hectares. On the other hand, breeding in australia stands out the most in three reasons that made roughly 200 million hectares of land became less useful
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | n0air9x9 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | hohadang99 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups However sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 78
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Farming
...ell beneath with 300 million is harmed. farming practice in this area is the reason for...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reason for spoiling 300 million hectares of land. asia saw a balance figures with...
^^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Asia
...spoiling 300 million hectares of land. asia saw a balance figures with different fa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e world which are australia and Europe. it can be noticed that in both region tree...
^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding in australia stands out the most in three reasons that made roughly 200 mill...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36558615076 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5626310905 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127052870675 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729141549551 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063927004629 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949280826842 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493980722325 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.