The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
I think that the decision taken by the president of Seatown University is bizarre and irrational as they didn't ponder upon any other possibilities of professor retention.
Firstly, one should note the differences between Seatown University and Oceania University in terms of number of professors, their pay, other utilities, area, etc as this will help them understand, if the problems faced the professors of Oceania University are also faced by Seatown University, leading them to quit the university.
Secondly, one should conduct a survey for the professors of Seatown University to find out if the pay or tuition is the issue or if there are any other problems. Because, if there are any other issues, then resolving them would be sufficient.
Thirdly, one has to consider if the university will incur any loses if they provide free tuition to the professors. As it will be detrimental to the university if it goes into loses. They should also think of other alternatives other than free tuition.
On the basis of the results of the above, it will be easier for university to take a decision regarding the free tuition.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 25
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 33
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rsity is bizarre and irrational as they didnt ponder upon any other possibilities of ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...detrimental to the university if it goes into loses. They should also think of ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 2235.4752809 42% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 442.535393258 42% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04787234043 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.55969084622 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8571851958 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 215.323595506 46% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 704.065955056 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2199944595 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 5.21951772744 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229476411912 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105669741866 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584609829994 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137035297616 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249115865167 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.