Some people think that international car-free days are effective way of reducing air pollution. Others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In contemporary time, major countries around the globe have started experiencing continuous increment in air pollution. In turn, a group of individuals conceive a notion that the best way to tackle the air pollution is to have global vehicle free days. On the other hand, some others are of the opinion that there are many measures that can ameliorate such pollution issue. Therefore, ahead of my position both aspects ought to be discussed.
Pondering on the former view, the foremost reason that the supporters put forth is that as vehicles, especially cars produce considerable amount of air pollution, car free days could reduce the pollution enhancing substances that are the end products of combustion of fosile fuels used in motors. Consequently, providing clean air for citizens. Additionally, by having such environmental friendly days, people can be encouraged of using public transportation and eventually there can be less private vehicles on the roads. Subsequently, there will be less jam packed roads and ultimately, there will be not only less air pollution but also it can lead to paucity of noise pollution.
Expounding the later side, there is a plethora of approaches that can facilitate the air pollution issue. Firstly, the industries such chemical plants and production units that are harming air should be subject to hefty taxes. Government should persuade such organizations engaged in such sectors to develop eco-friendly methods and subsidies them. Secondly, as trees are the lungs of the world, residents should be cajoled to grow more trees in the neighborhood by celebrating tree days. Plants and trees play a vital role in purifying air and thus can significantly improve the quality of air and locals can breath dust free air.
To summarize and provide my opinion, It is quite conspicuous to me from above deliberation that although by celebrating car free days, people can improve the air quality, other tactics such as imposing heavy taxes to promote environment friendly technology by industries and by having more flora, we can make a greater difference in eradication of air pollution as it involves joint efforts from authorities and public.
- In some countries people of all ages place extra emphasis on sports and exercising. Do you think it is a positive development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience. 78
- In some countries people of all ages place extra emphasis on sports and exercising. Do you think it is a positive development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience. 78
- Some people think that international car free days are effective way of reducing air pollution Others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- The graph show the percentage of people aged over 60 in Canada Finland and Korea between 1950 and 2050 62
- In recent years children have been given more freedom than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: BREATHE_BREATH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'breathe'? 'breath' is a noun.
Suggestion: breathe
...prove the quality of air and locals can breath dust free air. &...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46808510638 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17673896301 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539893617021 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 170.850715369 49.4020404114 346% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.909090909 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1818181818 20.7667163134 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103195975424 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054389082071 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580506645725 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853393751245 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417078311563 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.