Some people think that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police forces and military forces. Others believe that women are not suitable for this kind of work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary world, gender equality exerts considerable influence on employee recruitment. Some think that women should play an equal part as men in a country's police forces and military forces while others contend that women do not have the ability to do this kind of work well.
Persuasive arguments can be made that employing women in police forces and military forces has myriads of benefits. To start with, this behavior shows the equality of hiring employees. Therefore, it is more likely to decrease the possibility of people’s complaints and build a harmonious society. In addition, women in police and military forces may bring some new ideas to handle difficult problems from different angles. For example, when it comes to juvenile delinquency, women employees will tell these youngsters some interesting stories in order to avoid them committing crimes again, while their counterparts will just put them into prisons.
On the other hand, many individuals argue that women are not suitable for this kind of work and some drawbacks do exist. First and foremost, women have poor strength and stamina. As a result, they will not focus on their important jobs after a long time working. What is more, women cannot protect themselves in dangerous situations. That is to say, they will make themselves trapped into dangers because of lack of power.
In conclusion, in terms of gender equality in a country’s police forces and military forces, blessings and curses coexist. As far as I am concerned, I contend that its benefits far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, to start with, what is more, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22745098039 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79383624314 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0011337726 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39790669357 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114277747141 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121914901441 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227454329364 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10108183864 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.