In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
In the UK, old people tend to spend the last years of their lives in old age homes that have nurses to take care of them and at times the government was made to pay for this facility. In my opinion, not only has the government is responsible to pay for this care but also the family to which the old members belong.
Families have the moral responsibility to pay for the care received by the old members of theirs. Since the context of old age care’s resposibilty is restricted to the rich country Great Britain, most of the english families are well off to take care of the ageing members. Moreover, being busy at personal works makes younger generation unable to spend time with and take of the older generation and thus, forcing the elders to search of caring homes. The Times has reported that 90% of aged population in Rugby, UK old agee homes comes from rich background. Therefore, these families cannot rely on the government when they can afford.
At the same time, not all the families of the UK are rich, some proportion lives below the poverty line. In this case, the government should shoulder the care of the old age members, as it is impossoble for these poverty striken families to sustain with high cost old age care. In 1990, 80% of the aged people in the slums of London died sooner than the national’s average age, as the british government stopped subsidizing their care. This horrid incident reiterated the moral role of the government in taking care of it elderly citizens.
To conclude, Majority of british citizens prefer to live in old age homes as they grow old, and the cost of this is being paid subsidized by the government in some cases. I believethat the family must pay for its members if it can afford, but in the case
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Wajeeha Umer | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 73
- 2.Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- computers are being used more and more in education.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r this facility. In my opinion, not only has the government is responsible to pay...
^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...rs to search of caring homes. The Times has reported that 90% of aged population in...
^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this poverty' or 'these poverties'?
Suggestion: this poverty; these poverties
...ld age members, as it is impossoble for these poverty striken families to sustain with high c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5917721519 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51300694261 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509493670886 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0690482677 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421758369637 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171986311827 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104732020345 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306998800863 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818072237923 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.