The percentage of tourists to england who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The line chart given below illustrate the percentage of tourist to England who visited four diverge attractions in Brighton through five years. Overall it can be seen the highest amount percentage attraction which visited by tourist to England was Pavilion. inverse of those, the lowest obtained by pier attraction. It measured in percentage
Regarding to the data, started from 1980 to 1990 festival had the biggest total of tourist in initial year at 30%. Follower by Art gallery and Pavilion visited below 25% tourist at the same time. But Pavillion had higher tourist than art gallery. While pier was the smallest attractions which seen. There was significant increase of 13% amount of tourist who visited Pavilion from 27% to 40% between 1985 and 1990. Three other attractions dipped gradually till 1990. Pier attraction registered a rapid decrease than others
From 1995 to 2010, there was a rapid peak about 4% of tourists was visited festival and remain stable for three years. Pier attraction indicated growth minimally smaller than amount of tourist who visited festival but reached an increased at 9% during 5 years. Pavillion attractions was the hugest quantity of tourist in last year (2010) but those achievement was lower than total tourist in 1995. And art gallery attraction in four years latest saw fluctuated amount of tourist, conclude this attraction as the lowest attraction which visited by tourist in the end
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | Brian Sahar | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homewrok plays an important role in the education of children 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable place to entertain people, while othere believe that the purpose of museums is to educate 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective and at worst the may be dangerous 67
- Online sales for retail sectors in Canada 56
- Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Inverse
...ted by tourist to England was Pavilion. inverse of those, the lowest obtained by pier a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on had higher tourist than art gallery. While pier was the smallest attractions which...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this achievement' or 'those achievements'?
Suggestion: this achievement; those achievements
...antity of tourist in last year 2010 but those achievement was lower than total tourist in 1995. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'years the latest'.
Suggestion: years the latest
...995. And art gallery attraction in four years latest saw fluctuated amount of tourist, concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 937.175257732 129% => OK
No of words: 232.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19396551724 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57566457605 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 127.690721649 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538793103448 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 290.88556701 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5084926408 44.8134815571 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6923076923 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92307692308 4.34317383033 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420144066812 0.216113520407 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159612104948 0.0766984524023 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128703457131 0.0603063233224 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33011974216 0.12726935374 259% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129605295324 0.0580467560999 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 8.37731958763 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 8.71597938144 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 41.2886597938 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.