Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that the government should not invest money in public libraries because online libraries also have their functions. Although, computer technology has some benefits, I side with the view that it can not replace physical libraries.
On the one hand, online libraries help administrative employees look up information at ease. Consequently, those who have a hectic schedule can not visit physical libraries during a limited operating hours. Furthermore, online library can store an enormous amount of information that is greater than any public libraries. Small-sized physical libraries, for instance, are not enough space to contain a huge number of bulky books such as the complete Sherlock Holmes, Harry Porter and encyclopedia, while computer technology has functions that enable us store them with only several gigabytes.
On the other hand, public libraries have many positive influences on readers, which fail to be substituted by online sources. Firstly, libraries are still one of the most popular means of accessing information among senior citizens, regardless the availability of computer technology. In Viet Nam for example, almost elderly people are technophobes and unaware of recent developments in computer technology , so that, traditional libraries are their preferred option. Secondly, public libraries are considered a more reliable and accuracy source of information. The reason for this is that books in physical libraries are carefully categorized by library staffs. Meanwhile, online libraries are likely to have a harmful information ranging from pornographic to reactionary content, as a result, they might detrimentally impact on reader’s behavior, especially young people.
In conclusion, while there are some advantages of online libraries, I believe that it is worth preserving public libraries because they play a crucial role for human.
- Hogwards Grammar School 56
- Hogwards Grammar School 56
- The tables below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
- The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...al libraries during a limited operating hours. Furthermore, online library can store ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cent developments in computer technology , so that, traditional libraries are thei...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se they play a crucial role for human.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06467892886 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.82828733 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158536600522 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626522024028 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280372910634 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103716044533 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342302833796 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.