Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether technology has actually made more simple or complicated our lives. Indisputably, an excessive use of technology has hindered our privacy. However, it has introduced practical advantages and enhaced the overell knowledge. The main reason which leads me to reject the statement proposed are the multiple practical solutions which have been introcued into our daily life thanks to technology. The way we live has drastically changed because of the innovations techonolgy has carried out: cars, airplane, washing machine, cellphone, internet...etc. All of them have drastically reduce the time needed to carry out specific task compared to before. For instance, before airplanes were introduced, it took weeks to travel from Europe to United States. Now, the time required is just a couple of hours. The introducetion of cellphone has made possible to be connected with friends around the globe in few seconds. The time needed to wash clothes has shrinked because of washing machine. The main advantages of all these technologies is the increase in the spare time that people can enjoy or dedicate to work. Therefore, without these advancements our lives would have been much more complex and slowed by practical matters. In addition, technology has made our lives easier compared to its absence because it has contributed to enhance the overall knowledge and welfare. Firstly, we can now surf on the web and find e-books, youtube videos and much more if we want to study a specific subject. Before the introduction of the web this was not possible and knowledge was much more concentrated in specific part of the population. Moreover, the introduction of technologies for the production of food at large scale has made sustainable the increase in the world's population. Therefore, technology has made less complicated our lives by bolstering both our overall knowldege and welfare. In conlusion, thanks to technology we are now able to tackle practical problems and solve them in a faster way. Moreover, it has contributed to increase our knowldge and welll-being of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | ritobhash | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | kanishkbar4321@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | laurelstockwell | 50 | view |
- In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 66
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 66
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of boo 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ages and enhaced the overell knowledge. The main reason which leads me to reject...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 680, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...net...etc. All of them have drastically reduce the time needed to carry out specific t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1086, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as shrinked because of washing machine. The main advantages of all these technologi...
^^^
Line 1, column 1324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omplex and slowed by practical matters. In addition, technology has made our liv...
^^
Line 1, column 1856, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...as made sustainable the increase in the worlds population. Therefore, technology has m...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1987, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both our overall knowldege and welfare. In conlusion, thanks to technology we ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28698224852 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97780881372 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1997963707 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0526315789 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137778435587 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401102498611 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459183053964 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137778435587 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.